Artikel 30

1. A maintenance arrangement made in a Contracting State shall be entitled to recognition and enforcement as a decision under this Chapter provided that it is enforceable as a decision in the State of origin.
2. For the purpose of Article 10(1) a) and b) and (2) a), the term “decision” includes a maintenance arrangement.
3. An application for recognition and enforcement of a maintenance arrangement shall be accompanied by the following –
a) a complete text of the maintenance arrangement; and
b) a document stating that the particular maintenance arrangement is enforceable as a decision in the State of origin.
4. Recognition and enforcement of a maintenance arrangement may be refused if –
a) the recognition and enforcement is manifestly incompatible with the public policy of the State addressed;
b) the maintenance arrangement was obtained by fraud or falsification;
c) the maintenance arrangement is incompatible with a decision rendered between the same parties and having the same purpose, either in the State addressed or in another State, provided that this latter decision fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition and enforcement in the State addressed.
5. The provisions of this Chapter, with the exception of Articles 20, 22, 23(7) and 25(1) and (3), shall apply mutatis mutandis to the recognition and enforcement of a maintenance arrangement save that –
a) a declaration or registration in accordance with Article 23(2) and (3) may be refused only on the ground set out in paragraph 4 a);
b) a challenge or appeal as referred to in Article 23(6) may be founded only on the following – (i) the grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement set out in paragraph 4;
(ii) the authenticity or integrity of any document transmitted in accordance with paragraph 3;
(i) the grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement set out in paragraph 4;
(ii) the authenticity or integrity of any document transmitted in accordance with paragraph 3;
c) as regards the procedure under Article 24(4), the competent authority may review of its own motion the ground for refusing recognition and enforcement set out in paragraph 4 a) of this Article. It may review all grounds listed in paragraph 4 of this Article and the authenticity or integrity of any document transmitted in accordance with paragraph 3 if raised by the respondent or if concerns relating to those grounds arise from the face of those documents.
6. Proceedings for recognition and enforcement of a maintenance arrangement shall be suspended if a challenge concerning the arrangement is pending before a competent authority of a Contracting State.
7. A State may declare, in accordance with Article 63, that applications for recognition and enforcement of a maintenance arrangement shall only be made through Central Authorities.
8. A Contracting State may, in accordance with Article 62, reserve the right not to recognise and enforce a maintenance arrangement.