ECLI:NL:HR:2019:793
ECLI:NL:HR:2010:BL2823
ECLI:NL:HR:2004:AM2533
ECLI:NL:HR:2026:826
that the system for the enforcement of life imprisonment is structured in such a way that it does not violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights [a footnote refers to the Supreme Court judgments of 19 December 2017 (see paragraph 14...
ECLI:NL:HR:2026:826
takes place by one year (that is, after 28 rather than 27 years of detention). This will allow more time for a gradual expansion of reintegration activities once the person serving a life sentence has been admitted to the reintegration phase.” (...)...
ECLI:NL:HR:2026:826
It is still the case that the reassessment of the continuation of the deprivation of liberty under the new rules takes place in the context of a pardon procedure. 25 years after the start of the imprisonment, a first assessment is now carried out by...
ECLI:NL:HR:2026:826
It is still the case that the reassessment of the continuation of the deprivation of liberty under the new rules takes place in the context of a pardon procedure. 25 years after the start of the imprisonment, a first assessment is now carried out by...
ECLI:NL:HR:2026:826
nced to life imprisonment, based on a judicial review instead of the current pardon procedure. Further, individual sentence-planning objectives should already be defined at the outset of the sentence, offering the persons concerned a real and effecti...
ECLI:NL:GHARL:2026:587
9 maanden. Gelet op het feit dat de schending van de termijn het gevolg is van aanhouding van de zaak vanwege toegewezen onderzoekswensen van de verdediging, waaraan door toedoen van verdachte pas na langere tijd uitvoering kon worden gegeven, zal he...